Comments on: Recurring digit dates http://www.jbwan.com/2009/09/09/recurring-digit-dates/ Jonathan Brazil's view of the world Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:00:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: jbwan http://www.jbwan.com/2009/09/09/recurring-digit-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-380 jbwan Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:58:10 +0000 http://www.jbwan.com/?p=963#comment-380 Aarrrggh! Too many levels of indirection and nesting. I knew I was in over my head! I have to say that I agree with the noticeable lack of YYYY format years in this post and those related to it. I had to fight with myself to force the post and hold onto a wee sentimental moment, whereby recurring digit dates actually exist and provide an unquestionable and inexplicable pleasure for number enthusiasts. Pure filth in the eyes of many... :) Aarrrggh! Too many levels of indirection and nesting. I knew I was in over my head!

I have to say that I agree with the noticeable lack of YYYY format years in this post and those related to it. I had to fight with myself to force the post and hold onto a wee sentimental moment, whereby recurring digit dates actually exist and provide an unquestionable and inexplicable pleasure for number enthusiasts. Pure filth in the eyes of many… :)

]]> By: Paul M. Watson http://www.jbwan.com/2009/09/09/recurring-digit-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-379 Paul M. Watson Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:33:39 +0000 http://www.jbwan.com/?p=963#comment-379 And a meta-post at that. Next recurring digit date you'll have to do a meta-meta-post. One thing I do find odd is that we are all using the two-digit-saving pre-2000 date style here. Didn't we spend billions fixing that problem? And a meta-post at that. Next recurring digit date you’ll have to do a meta-meta-post.

One thing I do find odd is that we are all using the two-digit-saving pre-2000 date style here. Didn’t we spend billions fixing that problem?

]]>